Hmph. The media talking heads are crediting Hillary's better-than-predicted showing in NH (so far) to her display of emotion yesterday, saying it "humanized" her or some such.

Isn't it more likely that what moved people was disgust at the media's hyperattention to that moment? Based on what I've heard people saying, that seems more plausible to me.

[9:45pm] CNN has Clinton 39% to Obama 36% with 48% reporting. But I notice that Durham, Hanover, Plymouth have no results reported yet... Keene broke strong for Obama, Manchvegas & Nashua for Clinton.

[10:10pm] Kos points out, and CNN's exit poll page bears it out, there's a big gender gap. Not so in Iowa.

[10:40pm] AP calls it for Hillary Clinton. CNN still doesn't have those college towns up, but the TV is saying HC actually won in Durham and Hanover. Either way, with 67% reporting, she's up by about 6,000 votes. All of us voting on February 5th (yup, that includes Massachusetts), looks like it's still going to be a competitive race--on both sides!

[10:55pm] Thought that sounded weird. Hanover went for Obama 58% to 26%. I still don't see anything for Durham.

[11:15pm] Time for bed! The biggest losers in NH: Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, John Edwards, and Chris Matthews. Talk to you tomorrow.

[7:45am] Durham and Plymouth went strongly for Obama. With 96% reporting, Clinton's lead in votes has increased to nearly 8,000, but her percentage lead has shrunk to 2% (39% to 37%).